Do you now have a full 66 book canon among all of your members?
Or, are you all still struggling with 2 Peter, the end of Revelation and Song of Solomon?
(05-03-2016, 03:55 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]Do you now have a full 66 book canon among all of your members?
Or, are you all still struggling with 2 Peter, the end of Revelation and Song of Solomon?
You're funny.
The .org forum has 269 members. A great number of them were members before you ever stated managing it. The forum is somewhere around 4 years old now. That's 67 members A YEAR....
The FFF has always been a lurker forum. Far more lurk than participate.
Your number falls way short. We are more than that with Tapatalk users.
Besides do you even have a complete Bible among all your members here? I feel as if I am looking in the mouth of an old gator wrestler from the Okefenokee swamp. I am not sure you have a complete set.
(05-03-2016, 04:12 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]Your number falls way short. We are more than that with Tapatalk users.
Besides do you even have a complete Bible among all your members here? I feel as if I am looking in the mouth of an old gator wrestler from the Okefenokee swamp. I am not sure you have a complete set.
Sure you do. Tapatalk users have an account don't they? Your forum lists 269 users. That's it. Tapatalk works with existing account. It doesn't hold separate accounts.
You're not hitting on much today are you?
Yes. I have a complete Bible. Its just not what you expect me to have. That's okay. We're all different. We are all at different points in our walk with Christ. I suspected that what really what started you targeting me at the .org forum.
It doesn't take much to realize you really don't that much about the biblical canon. You know about as much as you think you know about administering websites.
Tapatalk users not included in the membership list...... Geesh..... You're a legend aren't you?
Tapatalk lists 252. I am sure there is some overlap, but Tapatalk users are not included in the forum stats unless they are the same user.
I know enough that none of you agree on the canon over here.
Why call yourselves a fundamental forum when none of you are fundamentalists... You reject fundamentalism and you don't even have a full 66 book canon?
Your forum name is deceiving.
(05-03-2016, 04:18 PM)admin Wrote: [ -> ]Tapatalk users not included in the membership list...... Geesh..... You're a legend aren't you?
He's just probably trying to make the case for the option of him really being a mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging moron with a single digit IQ instead of simply being a liar.
(05-03-2016, 04:22 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]Tapatalk lists 252. I am sure there is some overlap, but Tapatalk users are not included in the forum stats unless they are the same user.
I know enough that none of you agree on the canon over here.
Why call yourselves a fundamental forum when none of you are fundamentalists... You reject fundamentalism and you don't even have a full 66 book canon?
Your forum name is deceiving.
Again.... you're such a legend.....
The FFF has always been made up of Fundamentalist and non-Fundamentalist. Its why its has "fighting" in the name..... Geesh...
The .org is full of non-Fundies.
Will you take down the site because its misrepresented?
It would help if you could really put more than 1+1 together in an argument.....
All fundamentalist are welcome here. All non-fundamentalists are welcome here. "Iron, sharpens Iron".