FSSL > 04-30-2016, 06:44 PM
admin > 04-30-2016, 07:13 PM
(04-30-2016, 06:44 PM)FSSL Wrote: Your unfettered "defense" equals false and unprovable accusations as we see here on your forum.
Setting up this forum and soliciting current posters away from the active and functioning FF.org is unethical.
You rescued FFF from the unusable .com (applaud able)
You are trying to take down the active .org (Not cool)
The Rogue Tomato > 04-30-2016, 09:03 PM
FSSL > 05-01-2016, 12:49 AM
admin > 05-01-2016, 03:23 AM
(05-01-2016, 01:41 AM)aleshanee Wrote:FSSL is living in his own little world. He knows what's he's saying is largly not true.(05-01-2016, 12:49 AM)FSSL Wrote: My regret is that I didn't ban Tomato permanently and right away when he posted the nudity.
The reason I disabled Tomato and Aleshanee's accounts was because they have publicly aligned with you on this forum and publicly stated they were recruiting from my forum. Banning would be an overreach. Changing their credentials would prove that anyone from using their accounts until the "dust settled."
This all was brought about by your misuse of my admin login. I had reason to believe Tomato and Aleshanee would have gladly let you go through their logins as well.
I accept your apology. Thank you.
I only joined here to tell you under what terms your return to .org would entail. I am not here to add more straw to your bonfire.
that is a bald faced lie and you know it....... where did i publicly say anything about recruiting people from your forum before you disabled my account?....... according to what you yourself said and the timeline of events my account had already been disabled before i even knew about this forum..... ...
yeah i posted things here... on this forum... about recruiting people to this forum.... from wherever they might be........ but that was only after you posted on your forum that i had been blocked from there....... ... but for all i know that is a lie as well....... i haven;t even tried to log in on your forum since april 22..... i have no desire to.... and i had already stopped posting on it long before that........
ya know.... an intelligent person would have gotten the message by now that i have no intention of ever returning to your party..... and as far as i am concerned you can delete my account from your forum and completely erase my name from the face of it...... ........ but i already know you won;t do that last part..... and several people have told me why....... ..... my name being associated with your forum has actually brought traffic to it.... and there are a lot of people there who didn;t want to see me walk away from it when i did...... ... and all of us... including them... know the reason you don;t want any of them to see the link to this forum is because some of them might actually wander over here - whether actively recruited or not - and try it out for a while...... ..... then after they discover it;s not run by an arrogant and heavy handed control freak they might actually decide to stay.........
and be honest about it.... you didn;t ban rogue tomato after the nudity thing because you were having too much fun with it..... trolling and provoking people to get cheap thrills is apparently your thing...... and you trolled that situation for all it was worth....and then some...... ....now why don;t you go trolling along back to your own forum and leave this one alone....... just the very fact you were allowed to log in here and say your piece while still refusing to give anyone else the same courtesy on your own forum, speaks volumes about how your character measures up to the people you came here to criticize ........... and in case you need help figuring that out........ ..it doesn;t...........
The Rogue Tomato > 05-01-2016, 06:02 AM
(04-30-2016, 03:32 PM)FSSL Wrote: — Acknowledge that you have no proof that the admins are reading your PMs. It is pure speculation on your part. The admins do not have the ability to read those PMs, unless they have been copied on those PMs.
FSSL > 05-01-2016, 02:22 PM
admin > 05-01-2016, 02:37 PM
(05-01-2016, 02:22 PM)FSSL Wrote: It is impossible for an admin to view Private Messages in the forum software. Your admin will not admit to it. He will not challenge your delusions. He will happily let you believe the worst. What kind of admin will allow this dishonesty to continue? Not me.
Therefore, until you fully retract the nonsense, you are not coming back to the .org.
The Rogue Tomato > 05-01-2016, 03:59 PM
(05-01-2016, 02:22 PM)FSSL Wrote: It is impossible for an admin to view Private Messages in the forum software. Your admin will not admit to it. He will not challenge your delusions. He will happily let you believe the worst. What kind of admin will allow this dishonesty to continue? Not me.
Therefore, until you fully retract the nonsense, you are not coming back to the .org.
(05-01-2016, 02:37 PM)admin Wrote:(05-01-2016, 02:22 PM)FSSL Wrote: It is impossible for an admin to view Private Messages in the forum software. Your admin will not admit to it. He will not challenge your delusions. He will happily let you believe the worst. What kind of admin will allow this dishonesty to continue? Not me.
Therefore, until you fully retract the nonsense, you are not coming back to the .org.
There isn't a interface in SMF forum software to read PM's directly. HOWEVER, SMF forum software stores those PM message in plain text format within the database the forum software uses. So, when you imply you can't. That's wrong. You can. You're just carefully choosing your words. Most any forum software does not waste cpu resources to encrypt anything. Add the security concerns associated with encrypted communication and its never really been on most forum software "road map". This one reason that forum software of this type can greatly benefit from compression.
FSSL > 05-01-2016, 04:14 PM