The Fighting Fundamental Forums

(05-02-2016, 02:46 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]We live rent free in your heads!

Says the person who started this thread and won't go away and leave it alone.

(05-02-2016, 02:41 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]I am neither threatened nor obsessed. Instead of lurking, I thought it might be helpful to undermine your conspiracies. Why should I sit back and let falsehoods go unchallenged?

Do whatever you want to do with the rules of the forum. Even if you break a rule and want to argue about the rule, I promise, I will not ban you for arguing with me over it. You're not a danger to order here. Neither was Rogue at ff.org.

Admit it, you made a mistake. We all make mistakes. We ALL need to be called on our mistakes.... and NOT pretend we don't make them.

This forum started as a tirade against me and the FF.org

I have a right to defend myself. Further, I have outlined what it will take for you all to come back. You complained about not having your account deleted. Then you complain about being locked out.

When your minds change again, these are the parameters.

(05-02-2016, 03:28 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]This forum started as a tirade against me and the FF.org

I have a right to defend myself. Further, I have outlined what it will take for you all to come back. You complained about not having your account deleted. Then you complain about being locked out.

When your minds change again, these are the parameters.

Okay, you defended yourself.  Again, and again, and again, even after being proved a liar multiple times.  You proclaim your innocence again and again in exactly the ways a guilty person would behave.  You repeat conditions for our return even after we said we have no desire to come back.  

Quit while you're behind and stop digging yourself deeper.  You don't like this forum.  You don't like the people here.  You made your demands multiple times for how we could come crawling back.  You've made all those things perfectly clear. 

Now just go away.

The two most popular threads on this forum are all about you bashing me, Ransom and the FFF.org

This forum started this way. That is the purpose and genius of this forum. It is a short sighted strategy. But trainwrecks are always interesting the first day.

(05-02-2016, 03:37 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]The two most popular threads on this forum are all about you bashing me, Ransom and the FFF.org

This forum started this way. That is the purpose and genius of this forum. It is a short sighted strategy. But trainwrecks are always interesting the first day.

The most popular thread on this forum is this one.  And you started it.

The most popular thread is my olive branch... wholly rejected.

It includes some interesting things like:
1) Praise_Yeshua and Tomato demonstrate to FSSL that full text PMs are in the database.
2) Tomato demonstrates a DOS command to shut down a forum like FF.com
3) Praise_Yeshua refuses to put a stated policy in place that protects the privacy and anonymity of users on this forum.

(05-02-2016, 02:51 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]Admins should not take sides? Great theory. It just exploded with this thread.

How?

I haven't taken a side in the discussion and punished you for it. That is what this all about.

Yes. You can have an opinion. It shouldn't "affect" how you manage a forum. 

How have I hindered you here? I've encouraged you say what you want to say.

(05-02-2016, 03:52 PM)FSSL Wrote: [ -> ]The most popular thread is my olive branch... wholly rejected.

It includes some interesting things like:
1) Praise_Yeshua and Tomato demonstrate to FSSL that full text PMs are in the database.
2) Tomato demonstrates a DOS command to shut down a forum like FF.com
3) Praise_Yeshua refuses to put a stated policy in place that protects the privacy and anonymity of users on this forum.

1. There is no reason to believe you didn't know this. If you REALLY.... didn't, then what does that say about you? After all. You readily gave a db away to someone else for support without any consideration to it. Not saying Rogue did anything with it..... BUT, don't tell me your privacy statement meant ANYTHING....

2. Its a common command. Tomota didn't let anything "out of the bag".

3. I have publicly stated that I will not share any information!!!

"I have publicly stated that I will not share any information!!!"
Why should I believe you?

I have publicly stated that I have not read PMs
YET, you accuse/d me of doing so.

The curious thing here is... why do you refuse to put a standard Privacy Policy in place?