praise_yeshua > 10-03-2016, 02:38 PM
lnf > 10-04-2016, 12:00 AM
praise_yeshua > 10-04-2016, 12:09 PM
aleshanee > 10-04-2016, 05:32 PM
(10-04-2016, 12:09 PM)praise_yeshua Wrote:(10-04-2016, 12:00 AM)lnf Wrote: It's better to have influence than authority.
I agree completely....
There is difference in seeking a reputation and having a testimony. Seeking a reputation is all about worldly ambitions. A good testimony simply does right and lets God handle the everything else.
lnf > 10-04-2016, 11:56 PM
(10-04-2016, 05:32 PM)aleshanee Wrote:You're absolutely right, aleshanee. I have worked under people with and without influence. The difference is remarkable. I have also been in positions of authority, and I truly believe that I had influence with the people I worked with. But my personal preference is to be in a position of responsibility, having influence with those in authority.(10-04-2016, 12:09 PM)praise_yeshua Wrote:(10-04-2016, 12:00 AM)lnf Wrote: It's better to have influence than authority.
I agree completely....
There is difference in seeking a reputation and having a testimony. Seeking a reputation is all about worldly ambitions. A good testimony simply does right and lets God handle the everything else.
influence is definitely better than authority..... of course it;s even better if the same person has both..... .... but what i have noticed is that when those in authority can;t seem to muster much influence they begin to misuse the power their authority gives them to target and attack those who do have it .......... ....nothing is more jealous than a person in power... or a person who thinks he should be in power....... watching his would be subordinates listen to somebody else......
Vincent Massi > 10-06-2016, 08:13 PM
Vincent Massi > 10-07-2016, 03:14 PM
aleshanee > 10-08-2016, 05:50 AM
praise_yeshua > 10-10-2016, 12:48 PM
(10-07-2016, 03:14 PM)Vincent Massi Wrote: Two FFFs ago, the forum was dying because a handful of posters were running people off. These people often posted strong, solid testimony about events they had not observed, attacking posters who described events they had actually observed.
My pastor is a leader in the local Assemblies of God district. His OPINION, which might be wrong, is that those posters had been rejected as leaders by every local congregation that knew them. The internet allowed them to become leaders simply by making a lot of posts. He felt that they were insecure, since God wasn't strengthening them, and so they would attack posters who knew what they were talking about.